外文翻译---客观性作为战略：新闻报道客观性概念的考察-新闻学(编辑修改稿)

外文翻译---客观性作为战略：新闻报道客观性概念的考察-新闻学(编辑修改稿)内容摘要：

rm that it is objective, because he presents/displays both sides of history without favoring to a political party or person some. In addition, when presenting/displaying both claims really, the objective journalist leaves supposedly is the consumer of the news that if decides the senator or the minister says the truth. To say that this practical one is a mechanism to maintain the objectivity is problematic. In this simple example we can label this practice saying that it supposes to provide a sufficient number of data to the consumer of the news so that decides by itself. The procedure can be plicated more and more. For example, within argument B, the defense minister can accuse the senator that he is making political with the national defense. The head of the General Staff of the army, a democrat, will pensate then the attacks of the defense minister having affirmed that he is the republican government who is putting in danger the national security with his systems of intelligence and their vain position in the subject of the military budget for the armament237。 stico development. On the following day, the president of a pacifist group of national scope will summon a press conference to blame both started off in controversy to overvalue the armament237。 stico development in damage of the diplomatic efforts for La Paz and the worldwide security. The minister spokesman of the government will make a sentence then of the pacifist leader being a supporter of the Comunism that tries to attack the American political processes. In this point, there are five people (the senator, the minister of defense, the head of the General Staff of the army, the pacifist leader and the spokesman of the government) who demand the truth for their affirmations of a nonverifiable way, and each one represents a possible reality. Analyzing the controversy about the marijuana, Goode (1970, pp. 5068) he calls to this gets into the mud of opinions that are said to themselves made the policy with the reality. Although this notion is important sociological, is useless for the journalists who face the dilemma to identify and to verify the facts. Anyway, the journalists claim to be objective when really match these claims and they publish them as they are followed one another day after day. According to he described a journalist to it, the consumer of the news will not receive in a single day all the sides of a history, but he will be seeing in a period of time a diversity of points of view on the subject. Like forum where the policy with the reality is ventilated, the journalistic definition of the situation goes beyond the presentation of the sufficient data so that the consumer of the news reaches a conclusion. A cluster of contradictory claims really, like which we have put as typical case, can that it is seen like a beneficial invitation, to the consumer of the news, so that exerts its selective perception, in a characteristic reaction before the news. Without a doubt which the invitation to a selective perception is insistent, because each version of the reality demands the same potential validity. In as much as soon as we define the objectivity as attention towards external objects to the mind and call objective to which it belongs to the object of the thought and not to the thinking subject (both definitions of dictionary), it will be difficult to maintain, since the journalists do, whom to present/display possibilities in conflict objectivity generates. 2. Presentation of the lifting evidence. Of course, there are occasions in which the journalist can obtain an evidence that really maintains a claim. A lifting evidence is the appointment and positioning of additional facts that monly we accepted like truth. This insistence in the lifting facts is generalized, appearing between the critics of the publishers and platoon leaders to the reporters, like between the critics of the reporters to the publishers and heads. For example, late an assistant to the director of the edition requested to the writing that became more objective necros, after reading an obituary note that he described to the deceased like a skillful musician. He asked: and how we know that the deceased was a skillful musician , and not a musician from three to the quarter that touched in the municipal band. One said to him that paragraphs more down in the note consisted that the concluded one had touched with John Philip Sousa. The additional fact, was suitable the edition head, justified the skillful musical term. Of seemed way, a reporter criticized his edition heads because they corrected bad and nonobjective, when an article was published on munist propaganda in certain surroundings. He expressed that the article at issue must have mentioned more done, for example what examined work titles were considered propaganda munist. Although he recognized that the label of munist propaganda was not a very fine characterization of each individual piece of Literature, insisted in which one more a more concrete presentation would be objective mor。