peerreviewprocessdescription(doc13)-品质管理(编辑修改稿)

peerreviewprocessdescription(doc13)-品质管理(编辑修改稿)内容摘要：

e  The author has stated his or her objectives for this inspection.  Reviewers are trained in the peer review process.  Documents to be inspected are identified with a version number. All pages are numbered and line numbers are displayed. The documents have been spellchecked.  Source code to be inspected is identified with a version number. Listings have line numbers and page numbers. Code piles with no errors or warning messages using the project’s standard piler switches. Errors found using code analyzer tools have been corrected.  For a reinspection, all issues from the previous inspection were resolved.  Any additional entry criteria defined for the specific type of work product are also satisfied. Planning Task Responsible 1. Give moderator the work product to be inspected and supporting documents, such as specifications, predecessor documents, or pertinent test documentation. Moderator 2. Determine whether work product satisfies inspection entry criteria. Author 3. Based on the size and plexity of the work product, determine how many inspection meetings will be required. Moderator and Author 4. Select inspectors and assign roles to individuals. Gain agreement from the other inspectors to participate. Moderator and Author 5. Determine whether an overview meeting is required. Author 6. Schedule the inspection, and possibly overview, meetings and distribute a meeting notice. Moderator 7. Distribute the inspection package to the participants at least 3 working days prior to the inspection meeting. Moderator or Author Overview Task Responsible 1. Describe the important features of the work product to the rest of the inspection team. State inspection objectives. Author 2. Evaluate the assumptions, history, and context of the work product. Inspectors Preparation Task Responsible 1. Ask Individual inspectors to prepare with specific objectives in mind, such as: checking the consistency of crossreferences。 checking for interface errors。 checking traceability to, and Moderator and Author Peer Review Process Description anization Page 6 consistency with, predecessor specifications。 or checking conformance to standards. 2. Examine the work product, to understand it, find defects, and raise questions about it. Use the appropriate defect checklist to focus attention on defects monly found in the type of product being inspected. Use other analysis methods to look for defects as appropriate. Inspectors 3. Log minor defects found, such as typographical errors or style inconsistencies, on the Typo List. Deliver this to the author at or prior to the inspection meeting. Inspectors Inspection Meeting Task Responsible 1. Open the Meeting: Introduce the participants (if necessary) and state their roles, state the purpose of the inspection, and direct inspectors to focus their efforts toward finding defects, not solutions. Remind participants to address their ments to the work product under review, not to the author. Moderator 2. Establish Preparedness: Ask each inspector for his or her preparation time and records the times on the Inspection Summary Report. If preparation is insufficient, reschedule the meeting. Moderator 3. Present Work Product: Describe portions of the work product to the inspection team. Reader 4. Raise Defects and Issues: Point out concerns, potential defects, questions, or improvement opportunities after the reader presents each section. Inspectors 5. Record Issues: Capture the information in Table 2 on the Issue Log for each issue raised. State aloud what was recorded to make sure it was recorded accurately. Recorder 6. Answer Questions: Respond briefly to any specific questions raised, and contribute to defect detection based on special understanding of the work product. Author 7. Make Product Appraisal: After all meetings scheduled for a given inspection are plete, decide on the work product appraisal, selecting from the options in Table 3. If the inspectors disagree, assign the most conservative appraisal offered by any of the inspectors. Inspectors 8. Sign Inspection Summary Report: All participants sign the Inspection Summary Report to indicate their agreement with the inspection oute. Inspectors 9. Collect Inspection Feedback. Ask the inspectors to evaluate the inspection and suggest improvements, using the Inspection Lessons Learned Questionnaire. Moderator Peer Review Process Description anization Page 7 Table 2. Information to Record for Each Defect Found. Column Description Origin development phase in which the defect was introduced Type  missing (something needs to be there but is not)  wrong (something is erroneous or co。