chasedreamgmatprep逻辑笔记(编辑修改稿)

chasedreamgmatprep逻辑笔记(编辑修改稿)内容摘要：

ratex carpet while the lobby of a nearby hotel was being carpeted with our petitor39。 s most durable carpet. Today, after a decade in which the two hotels have had similar amounts of foot traffic through their lobbies, that other hotel is having to replace the wornout carpeting near its lobby entrances, whereas the Cormond39。 s Duratex carpeting has years of wear left in it.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the advertisement39。 s evidence for concluding that Duratex carpet is more durable than the carpet of its petitor? A. The lobby of the Cormond Hotel has five different entrances, but the lobby of the other hotel has only two.B. The carpet of the Cormond Hotel39。 s lobby is not the most durable carpet that Duratex manufactures.C. The other hotel has a popular restaurant that can be reached from outside without walking through the hotel lobby.D. The carpet that is being used to replace carpeting near the other hotel39。 s lobby entrances is not Duratex carpet.E. There is a third hotel near the other two that has not replaced the Duratex carpet in its lobby for more than 15 years.1. 由问题问法得知，此题是评估类的题目。 2. 找到前提和结论：本题结论比较隐晦，注意在题目最开始的时候，注明了本文为advertisement。 所以一定是在宣传自己的好结论句应该是：Duratex的地毯好。 3. 判断推理模式：原文中涉及了对于在Cormond Hotel铺的Duratex地毯和其他酒店的其他品牌地毯的类比。 两者的人流量一样多，但是其它品牌的坏了，说明Duratex的地毯质量好 Other Hotel Cormond Hotel Foot traffic（相似点）Near（相似点）地毯也应该坏了 Foot traffic（相似点）Near（相似点）地毯坏了由原文可知，如果想削弱原文的广告，只要能削弱这个类比推理就可以了。 4. 找到答案方向：类比模式推理有两个CQ：CQ1：相似性问题CQ2：反案例问题答案选项，要么同时涉及两个案例，要么就一个也不涉及，提出第三个案例才能成为答案。 选项分析：A. Correct. Cormond Hotel的大厅有五个门，但是其它的Hotel的大厅有两个门。 显然涉及两个案例的一个不同点。 属于CQ1：相似性问题B. Cormond Hotel的大厅所铺设的地板并不是Duratex制造的最耐用的地板。 仅仅涉及Cormond这个案例。 C. Other Hotel有一个可以不从大厅走就能到达的很受欢迎的餐厅。 仅仅涉及了Other Hotel这个案例。 D. Other Hotel想要置换的地毯不是Duratex制造的地毯。 仅仅涉及了Other Hotel这个案例。 E. 另外一家Hotel用了Duratex的地毯十五年未坏。 不涉及两个案例，但涉及第三个案例，显然是CQ2的方向，是一个“正案例”，加强选项。 74. Comcorp Shipping Clerk: Last week, no shipments of building supplies were sent out on Friday. The five specially ordered shipments sent out last week were sent out on Thursday, and each of those specially ordered shipments consisted entirely of building supplies. Four shipments were sent to Truax Construction last week, none of which consisted of building supplies.If the shipping clerk’s statements are true, which of the following must also be true?A. All of Comcorp’s shipments of building supplies last week were specially ordered.B. None of Comcorp’s shipments sent on Friday of last week was sent to Truax Construction.C. None of the shipments sent by Comcorp to Truax Construction last week was specially ordered.D. None of Comcorp’s shipments sent on Thursday of last week was sent to Truax Construction.E. All of Comcorp’s shipments of building supplies last week were sent out on Thursday.1. 由问题问法得知，此题是演绎类的题目。 2. 对于演绎类题目，不需要评估，只要读懂原文，不加入任何外部知识，就可以选出答案。 选项分析：A. 所有建筑供给的Comcrop的上周的货船都是特定的。 文中说的是五个在周四的特定的订单都是关于建筑供给的，显然不能推出选项的结论。 B. 周五Comcrop的货船没有一个是给Truax Construction的。 周五Comcorp没有发过关于建筑供给的，Truax也没有收到关于建筑供给的，所以无法知道是不是Truax收到了周五发出的东西。 这个选项的内容无法确定。 C. Correct. 没有一个Truax收到的来自Comcorp的货船是特定的。 五个特定的货船都是在周四发出的，且都是关于建筑供给的。 而Truax没有收到关于建筑供给的东西，自然可以推出这个选项。 D. 没有一个在周四发出的Comcrop的货船是发往Truax的。 文中只说了五个特定的关于建筑供给的货船是周四发出去的，没有提到所有周四发出的货船都是关于建筑供给的，所以该选项不是答案。 E. 所有Comcrop的关于建筑供给的货船都是周四发出的。 文中只说周四发出了关于建筑供给的货船，将主项和谓项颠倒的选项肯定是不能合理推理出来。 75. Which of the following, if true, most logically pletes the reasoning in the passage?Kernland’s government restricts the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure a lowcost supply for domestic processing plants. Though the policy constrains farm ine and limits the number of farmers who can profitably grow cashews, the government defends it on the grounds that, since the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the restrictions would hurt efforts to reduce urban unemployment. However, the policy may actually have contributed to urban unemployment, since __________.A. a lack of profitable crops is driving many small cashew farmers in Kernland off their land and into the citiesB. some of the byproducts of cashew processing are used as raw materials by other industries located in Kernland’s citiesC. the government does not place similar restrictions on the export of any crop other than cashewsD. the ine earned by workers in the processing plants is generally greater than that earned by agricultural laborers in rural areasE. without governmental aid in some form, Kernland’s cashew processing plants would not be able to pete for sales in world markets1. 由问题问法得知，此题是评估类的题目。 2. 找到前提和结论：结论句是：The policy may actually have contributed to urban unemployment。 注意，本题的结论句其实是和原文整个推理过程相反的。 所以其实问题就是让我们削弱原文的推理。 3. 判断推理模式：首先排除类比和统计枚举，由于原文中涉及了政府提出的新政策，所以考虑一下是否是方案推理。 “方案”（Kernland’s government restricts the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure a lowcost supply for domestic processing plants.）其实就是“policy”. 从原文中我们体会到，这个policy其实是可以reduce unemployment rate的。 而文中的结论却说用这个方案会起反作用。 从文中来看，并没有涉及到评估方案的句子。 前提（方案）是：“减少未被处理的腰果的出口（处理地在城市内）”结论（目标）是：“减少城市的失业率”4. 找到答案方向：方案模式推理有三个CQ：CQ1：方案可行性问题CQ2：方案可接受性问题CQ3：方案的否定性副作用CQ4: 冲突目标 （极少） 方案模式推理，其实主要是抓住原文中提出的方案，去评估这个方案潜在的三个方面的问题。 如果与目标完全相悖，也可以成为选项。 （极少）选项分析：A. Correct. 缺乏有利润的庄稼令许多种腰果的农民离开农村到城市找工作。 涉及了方案，提出了policy带来的一个否定性的副作用，削弱了原文。 属于CQ3：方案的否定性副作用。 B. 有些处理腰果带来的副产物被Kernland城市中的其他工业当做原材料。 如果处理腰果会有好处，实行原文方案后，肯定会增加这个好处，可以算作一个方案的正作用。 C. 除了腰果之外，政府对于其他的庄稼都没有相似的限制。 该选项不涉及方案。 D. 加工农产品挣得钱要比在农村种庄稼挣的多。 同样的，这个选项不涉及方案。 E. 如果政府不以某种形式帮助，Kernland处理后的腰果在国际市场是并没有竞争力。 同样的，这个选项完全不涉及方案。 76. In response to mounting public concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the wellpublicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passengerjet division. When the program began in 1994, the division39。 s ha。