浅析木马赢家中的爱_毕业论文(编辑修改稿)

浅析木马赢家中的爱_毕业论文(编辑修改稿)内容摘要：

her thinks she is a good mother, because in her manner she is all the more gentle and anxious for her children, as if she loves them very much. Hester and her children know that it is not the fact, and they read it in each other‟s eyes. Hester only runs after money and does not care for Paul. She does not only find Paul bet on horse races, but also does not find Paul‟s ability of forecast. Only when Paul rides the horse furiously, she thinks Paul is too big for a rockinghorse because he is not a very little boy any longer. Even when he finds Paul is being crazy and his health is growing worse, she does not explore the deep reason of it. Hester only thinks her son is too nervous and advises Paul to go on a vocation. When Paul is going to die, he says something to Hester. “„I never told you, mother, that if I can ride my horse, and get there, then I‟m absolutely sure － oh, absolutely! Mother, did I ever tell you? I am lucky!‟ „No, you never did,‟ said the mother.” (王守仁 2020： 194) As a mother, she even does not remember what his son ever said seriously. Mother is Paul‟s most loved and important person, but Hester‟s bad manner and her absent love makes Paul want mother‟s love very much, and begins to seek the socalled luck for her. All in all, Hester is a bad and irresponsible mother. 2. Broken and Inplete Love Between Father and Son Oedipus Complex—— Hate Father “Castration plex, the third stage of Oedipus plex, is an important conception in psychoanalysis, which refers to an unconscious fear of having one‟s genitals removed, as a punishment for wishing to have sex with a parent. In Freudian theory, it is an unconscious anxiety arising during psychosexual development, represented in males as a fear that the penis will be removed by the father in response to have sexual interest in the mother. From the text, it is known that Paul has a serious Castration plex, so he is born to hate his father very much, and wants to have sex with his mother.”(Sigmund Freud 2020:356). Besides, from the perspective of traditional psychology analysis, fathers are the key persons in the development of their children. In most families, fathers take role of supporting the family. In The RockingHorse Winner, Paul‟s father has good prospects and a small ine, which is not enough for his family, and makes his wife and his son worried everyday. But it is strange that the father does not make any effort to earn money, as if making money to support the family is not his responsibility, which results in Paul‟s earning money to make his wife happy. Paul‟s father does not have luck which Paul‟s mother concerned, and ability to make his mother happy. From the “bonny children” (王守仁 2020： 183) and “Her children were growing up, they would have to go to school. There must be more money, there must be more money. The father who was always very handsome and expensive in his tastes, seemed as if he never would be able to do anything worth doing” (王守仁 2020： 183), it can be seen that the father does not have ability to earn enough money to support the family and never show love to his children. It is just because of his father‟s disability that leads to Paul‟s hatred to him. Under these circumstances, Paul produces an abnormal feeling to his mother and regards his mother as his own property and his father as his enemy, trying to replace his father to protect his mother. What‟s more, Paul‟s father never municates with him and takes care of him. He seldom appears in the short story and never has a direct munication with his family members. So Paul doesn‟t have any feelings to his father because of his inessential role. But Paul loves his mother, but his father cannot satisfy his mother, so Paul hates him. ’s Love is Absent From The RockingHorse Winner, it can be seen that the father treats the child with indifference and does not exchange any ideas with his son directly. It is the nature and responsible of the parents to love and take care of their children, but in The RockingHorse Winner, the father is mentioned few times in the story, so it is obvious that he does not love his children. In The RockingHorse Winner, the first time referred to Paul‟s father is that the father has a small ine and not nearly enough for his family, “The mother had a small ine, and the father had a small ine, but not nearly enough for the social position which they had to keep up. The father went in to town to some office. But though he had good prospects, these prospects never materialized. There was always the grinding sense of the shortage of money, though the style was always kept up. ” (王守仁 2020： 183)and next, the father does not consider about the shortage of money in the family. From these two points, a coldhearted, disabled, and irresponsible father is formed. When Paul asks his mother why their family does not keep a car of their own, his mother says because Paul‟s father has no luck. “„Mother,‟ said the boy Paul one day, „why don‟t we keep a car of our own? Why do we always use uncle‟s, or else a taxi?‟ „Because we‟re the poor members of the family,‟ said the mother. „But why are we, mother?‟ „Well － I suppose,‟ she said slowly and bitterly, „it‟s because your father has no luck.‟” (王守仁 2020： 184) It can be seen that the mother is so helpless because of his father‟s disability. Paul‟s father does not take responsibility to earn money and take care of the family, so he is a bad father. The only related words with his son is when his wife asks him who is Malabar their son often referred to, he said coldly, “I don‟t know.” (王守仁 202。