培训讲座采购管理最佳实践全英(编辑修改稿)

培训讲座采购管理最佳实践全英(编辑修改稿)内容摘要：

s: Transparency, Method •Specification/TOR/Quality •Availability of Funds •Value for Money/Cost Details/Consulting Fee •Evaluation Modality •Performance Security/Warranty •Shipping/Insurance •Licensing/Copyrights •Use of LTA •Type of Contracts •Payment Terms 37 Advisory Committee on Procurement • Established by CPO to oversee major contracts • Review contracts which involve mitments to a supplier with respect to a single requisition or series of req in a calendar year valued at $100,000 or more • Proposed contracts which generate ine of $10,000 • Any amendment of a contract previously reviewed by ACP where the contract amendment or a series of amendments either increases the total amount by 20% or $100,000 whichever is less. • Any amendment not previously submitted to the ACP where the revised total contract amount exceeds $100,000. 38 ACP: • Proposed contract that leads to series of contracts amounting more than $100,000. • Disposal, Writeoff or transfer of goods with asset value $30,000 or more • All vehicle accidents or losses when gross negligence is the cause. • Procurement of services related to individual consultants with contract amount exceeding $100,000. 39 A C P Su b m i s s i o n s 0 511%20%20%12%15%22%HQAAPASECL A CHQ A AP AS EC L A C T o t a l99 175 181 107 132 198 8924 0 m 1 5 4 m 1 5 8 m 1 1 9 m 3 2 m 9 6 m 5 9 9 m40 Common Reasons for Rejection  Failure to undertake a petitive exercise  Impermissible justification for waiver  TOR or Statement of Works or Specifications inplete  TOR or Statement of Works or Specifications too restrictive or biased  Incorrect evaluation methodology or criteria  Failure to submit requested documentation for ACP review  Conflict of interest  Value for money not obtained  Incorrect procurement method used  Incorrect shipping terms cited 41 Key Observations: • SOW/TOR not clear, Biased/ Inadequate specification or specific requirements or brand names • Evaluation Criteria does not cover all the deliverables and do not provide sufficient weight as per their importance • Wrong Procurement Methodology • Use of NGOs for procurement • Advance Payment on the very high side • Process too mechanical, Market research missing • Insufficient number of responses • Evaluation of Offers not done well 42 Oversight at a Glance: • Number of cases from RBLAC: 265 • Number of cases from RBAP: 236 • Number of cases from RBA: 205 • Number of cases from RBEC: 75 • Number of cases from RBAS: 89 • Number of cases from HQ units: 138 • Number of cases withheld for approval: 31% • Number of cases if “subject to” is included: Nearly 55% 43 Procurement certification • Course has been designed inhouse by OLPS • Addresses basic procurement policy and standard Atlas Procedures. • Objective: learners’ prehension of UNDP procurement policy and processes 2. Increase the level of petence utilizing the Atlas Applications. • Target group is “Buyer” • Online programme ( 6 hrs for online course and 2 hours for the exam.) • Course managed by LRC • Status: – Number of people enrolled:731 – Number of people who have passed simulated assessment: 345 – Number who took official assessment: 321 – Number who passed: 220 44 G e n e r a l R a t i n g P r o c u r e m e n t V o l u m e 3 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0P u r c h a s e O r d e r R a i s e d C o u n t 1345T o t a l v a l u e 2 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0n o n P O V o u c h e r s a b o v e 2 , 5 0 0 ( U S D ) C o u n t 400T o t a l v a l u e 9 8 0 , 0 0 0N E X P r o c u r e m e n t 2 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0D E X P r o c u r e m e n t 1 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0A g e n c y P r o c u r e m e n t 0C o u n t 6T o t a l v a l u e 1 8 0 , 0 0 0C o u n t 3T o t a l v a l u e 3 0 0 , 0 0 0+ O v e r a l l 35%+ M a n a g e m e n t o f D i r e c t P a y m e n t ( n o n P O ) 6 d a y s+ M a n a g e m e n t o f P a y m e n t ( P O ) 1 4 d a y s+ L e a d T i m e 1 0 / 7S u b m i s s i o n o f P l a n Y e sA p p r o v a l o f P l a n Y e sQ u a l i t y o f S u b m i s s i o n s + T o t a l 6D e l e g a t e d P r o c u r e m e n t a u t h o r i t y 5 0 , 0 0 0 ( U S D )P O s i s s u e s b e t w e e n 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 a n d D e l e g a t e d A u t h o r i t yC o u n t 3T o t a l v a l u e 1 7 0 , 0 0 0P O s i s s u e d a b o v e d e l e g a t e d a u t h o r i t y C o u n t 6T o t a l v a l u e 6 0 0 , 0 0 0N u m b e r o f s t a f f w i t h b u y e r p r o f i l e 8N u m b e r o f s t a f f C e r t i f i e d 5P r o c u r e m e n t V o l u m eH i g h v a l u e t r a n s a c t i o n s ( P O )3 0 , 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e o n P r o c u r e m e n tP r o c u r e m e n t C a p a c i t y 1 0 0 , 0 0 0L o w v a l u e t r a n s a c t i o n s ( P O )P r o c e s s T i m eP r o c u r e m e n t P l a nProcurement Dashboard Indicators 45 Global Fund Procurement: • Procurement forms nearly 80% of the project amount. • Focus is on HIV/AIDS, Malaria and TB • UNDP is involved in 28 countries as PR and for support services in 5 countries • Total project amount is nearly $650 m but annual delivery is nearly $200 m. • OLPS has one full time Procurement Advisor working very closely with the country offices and major suppliers. • Major suppliers are IDA, Mission Pharma, CIPLA, UNICEF, UNFPA, IAPSO etc. UNDP has LTA with them. • OLPS Procurement Advisor is focusing on assisting the country office to improve delivery, help them in transferring knowledge to the counterpart, help them build supply chain. 46 Long Term Arrangement: – LTA offer a number of advantages: – they offer the value for money advantages of centralized procuremen。