jacqueslacanelizabethbishop

jacqueslacanelizabethbishop内容摘要：

text (its differences from and relation to the signs around it). Transcendental signifier: absolute sign whose meaning(s) does not change in its context. (chap 3: 158。 chap 4: 174) Gender Difference Lacan‘s analogy of the restroom signs: (chap 4: 17172) 1. Arbitrary meaning structure determine gender difference 2. Slippery chain 3. It speaks man Phallus vs. Woman as Other (chap 4: 17273) In the Symbolic Order, phallus = wholeness and power。 wholeness  hole, in fact, nobody owns the phallus/power. Women as Lack, or ‗Other‘ which can move outside of language and be in ―jouissance.‖ the unconscious structured like language supported by F‘s view of repression (ideas repressed as codes) evidence from Freud‘s language of Dream (condensation, displacement, symbolization)。 S/s : / = the barrier between the conscious and the unconscious, which resists being represented。 / = the phallus. We are conditioned by the Symbolic order.  movement of our desire –like metonymy. (Cf. chap 4: 172) Insatiable Desire: Need, Demand, and Desire (1) (chap 3: 158) A child develops from need to demand and desire.// its movement from the Real, to the Imaginary and Symbolic. Need – requirements for brutal survival. (biological need)  absence of the mother  the baby‘s social, imaginary and linguistic functions evolve. the Real the Imaginary The Symbolic need demand desire Effects of the three orders: Need, Demand, and Desire (2) Demand: need formulated in language. Demand has two objects: one spoken, the other unspoken. verbalization of imaginary subjectobject, selfother relations. 66 (Grosz pp. 59 67) Desire: primally repressed wishes [for the Mother] reappear in and as unconscious desire. insatiable。 characterized by lack (of object). (Grosz pp. 59 67) Desire: expressed as Demand of Different Objects The connection of the desired object and the demanded: metonymic connection = whole and parts, or continguity (鄰近 ). () : maintenance of the bar Questions III 1. Do you agree with Lacan。