社团合作协议书英文版

社团合作协议书英文版内容摘要：

ons…… Internal examination procedures annex should describe in details the grading system, the role of the students in the process, the deliberation of the jury for giving distinction etc..... Example of agreement Each member institution formally recognises the modules offered within the programme and the credits awarded. The coordinator (should be defined by the consortium) collects the results from the partners and certifies to the consortium the oute of the assessments of each participant Each student will receive: o A joint Master’s degree (if allowed by the national or State legislation) or the national degree from the universities hosting the student (double degrees) o A joint certificate with the name of the graduate, the logos of the seven Universities and the signature of the coordinating institution. o A diploma supplement presenting the details of the participant’s academic programme and academic achievement. It should be produced by the coordinator (in the case of a joint degree), or by both the universities granting the degree (in the case of a double diploma) o ????? other solutions should be described Information about the Official signatures of the documents and example should be put in an annex of the agreement. 6 Accreditation system: the agreement should mention the official title of the degrees at each participating institution, the date of the accreditation and the length of the validity of the agreement. This table should be filled in for instance: Name of institution Title of degree awarded for this Master’s course by this institution Type of degree awarded Date and reference of formal approval of the degree . Quality assurance It is the responsibility of the consortium to define their criteria. Nevertheless, because different countries are involved, very general principles should be explained again such as: Example of agreement to be discussed Quality assurance will be based on both internal and external assessment measures. External quality assurance will be guaranteed by arranging frequent overall evaluations, under the responsibility of the board. This selfevaluation will be carried out every year. Internal quality mechanisms: to be discussed according to the specific activities of the works and evaluations made by the teachers to their students, how they take into account the remarks, they adapt their program after the feedback of each semester etc.... Student involvement on the board: to clearify their effective role in the board Evaluation and quality culture: To be discussed among the partnership. Example of problems listed: “Each University in the consortium follows its own national institutional quality assurance procedures to ensure that the programme maintains its high academic standard. Recognition of the degrees is a very important issue for the programme, and national authorities are therefore involved in its quality control. Institutional agreements have been made and signed by all Rectors/Presidents/ViceChancellors in order to certify the good practices of the work and to engage the responsibility of each institution on the quality control of the academic part of the programme. If for some reason, one institution is no longer accredited to award the Master’s degree after the period concerned。 the University will be removed from the programme pending new official accreditation. This will not affect students that are already in the system”. Quality assurance with respect to higher education in Europe: to explain other mechanisms used by the consortium if it is the case. . Administrative and financial issues This section should be short but should define some key points such as : Who administrates the budget To whom do the students pay the fees Who defines the price and at which point in the process Who makes the annual finance report Sustainability of the programme 7 . Confidentiality Example of agreement: Except as expressly authorised by, and subject to any obligations of this agreement, each member institution agrees to keep confidential any information, data, knowhow, document or other material which is municated to it as confidential, or the disclosure of which may be clearly prejudicial to the other member institution. Notwithstanding the above, a member institution is entitled to disclose confidential information which it is required by law to disclose or whic。