20xx年mbampa管理类联考真题-英语真题答案

20xx年mbampa管理类联考真题-英语真题答案内容摘要：

what is natural to kids, including our core beliefs about their psychological development. Take the toddler. I assumed that phase was something experts developed after years of research into children’s behaviour: wrong. Turns out, according to Daniel Cook, a historian of childhood consumerism, it was popularised as a marketing trick by clothing manufacturers in the 1930s. Trade publications counselled department stores that, in order to increase sales, they should create a “third stepping, stone” between infant wear and older kids’ clothes. It was only after “toddler” became a mon shoppers’ term that it evolved into a broadly accepted developmental stage. Splitting kids, or adults, into evertinier categories has proved a surefire way to boost profits. And one of the easiest ways to segment a market is to magnify gender differences or invent them where they did not previously exist. saying it is...the rainbow(Line 3, ),the author means pink______. [A]should not be the sole representation of girlhood [B]should not be associated with girls39。 innocence [C]cannot explain girls39。 lack of imagination [D]cannot influence girls39。 lives and interests to Paragraph 2, which of the following is true of colours。 [A]Colours are encoded in girls39。 DNA. [B]Blue used to be regarded as the colour for girls. [C]Pink used to be a neutral colour in symbolising genders. 7 [D]White is prefered by babies. author suggests that our perception of children39。 s psychological development was much influenced by_____. [A]the marketing of products for children [B]the observation of children39。 s nature [C]researches into children39。 s behavior [D]studies of childhood consumption may learn from Paragraph 4 that department stores were advised to_____. [A]focus on infant wear and older kids39。 clothes [B]attach equal importance to different genders [C]classify consumers into smaller groups [D]create some mon shoppers39。 terms can be concluded that girls39。 attraction to pink seems to be____. [A] clearly explained by their inborn tendency [B]fully understood by clothing manufacturers [C] mainly imposed by profitdriven businessmen [D]well interpreted by psychological experts 参考答案 26~30 ABACC Text 3 In 2020, a federal judge shook America39。 s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decadesby 2020 some 20% of human genes were parented. But in March 2020 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation (BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle. On July 29th they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court 8 overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Geics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman39。 s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a pany in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike. But as panies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented。 gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it。 and patents39。 monopolies restrict access to geic tests such as Myriad39。 s. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal taskforce urged reform for patents related to geic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule “is no less a product of nature... than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds. ” Despite the appeals court39。 s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court. As the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA moleculesmost are already patented or in the public domain .firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy, panies are eager to win patents for “connecting the dots,” explains Hans Sauer, a lawyer for the BIO. Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next ter。