鞋类和玩具：反倾销的受害者外文翻译(编辑修改稿)

鞋类和玩具：反倾销的受害者外文翻译(编辑修改稿)内容摘要：

r 7, 2020, the European Union on Chinese shoes antidumping sanctions on Chinese leather shoes originating in the introduction of the product for a period of 2 years of percent antidumping duties, despite MOFCOM spokesman Chong Quan said that there was no dumping in export of Chinese shoes, and the exported shoes did not cause essential damage to EU industry. It is remarkably discrimination to refuse recognizing the economic status and legal basis of all Chinese enterprises who responded to the antidumping case and decided to implement “all others rate” to all involved enterprises. At the same time, Pakistan, Peru, Venezuela, Canada and other countries also have been on China’s footwear has taken antidumping measures. Right now, Chinese shoes manufacturers are facing severe challenges to its traditional price advantage in the international market. The first is the rising costs squeezing corporate profits. During the year 2020, with the rising international oil prices, plastic raw materials prices also rose sharply. According to the plastic monthly report, from May 26 to May 30 week period in 2020, the prices of plastic raw materials market as a whole rose up to RMB 300800 / ton. In addition, the continued appreciation of the yuan, the export tax rebate rate cut, as well as the new “Labor Contract Law” and other factors have started to make shoes enterprises gradually lost their cost advantage, increasing the pressure on survival. The second is the lack of independent brands and Ramp。 D, wholesale capacity, weak antirisk capability. At present, the domestic shoemaking enterprises or most of the materials belongs to, or has been on behalf of Taiwan, Hong Kong and South Korea, Europe and the United States, and so did export orders from overseas customers, not their own brands and marketing, because shoemaking technology is not easy to copy. Once the costs of many customer orders had shifted to lowercost Southeast Asia, panies go down the tubes. According to the Asia Footwear Association by the end of 2020 statistics, of more than 5,000 shoemaking enterprises in Guangdong, more than 1,000 were in the closure in 2020, when the industry didn’t fully feel the pinch of financial crisis. Take Argentina as an example, it initiated antidumping investigation on footwear originating in or imported China. On February 26, 2020, the Argentine Ministry of Economy issued Resolution No. 42/2020, decision on the originating in or imported footwear from China initiated antidumping cases. If the survey confirmed the existence of dumping practices indeed, will imports from China of such products be imposed punitive antidumping duties. Argentina “national newspaper” reported that the investigation carried out from the beginning of last year. Argentina Footwear Association submitted their applications to the Government, accusing dumping phenomenon is prevailing in footwear products imp。