这场专业教育的危机是用人单位所担心的吗外文翻译-教育教学(编辑修改稿)

这场专业教育的危机是用人单位所担心的吗外文翻译-教育教学(编辑修改稿)内容摘要：

ion period. Naturally, at the same time, consistent forms are being worked out to look for new workers and strategies to get them adapted to the job in the particular enterprise. In the course of the monitoring survey, considerable attention has been focused on analyzing these processes. One objective of the analysis is to discover the system of criteria for rating the quality of potential workers, criteria that the employers use in the course of their everyday procedures for selecting personnel. It is essential to determine what such a system of criteria is in order to make it possible for the system of professional education to work out the best way not only to train the kinds of workers that are in demand in the labor market but also to ensure that workers are equipped with the appropriate formal credentials certifying the level and quality of their professional education. The preceding stages of the monitoring survey showed that the mass employer does not have an explicit system of formal requirements to serve as the basis for the selection of workers in the labor only formal criterion is a worker’s possession of a diploma or certificate attesting to acquisition of a professional education, preferably a higher education, even in cases where a higher education is not needed for the assigned job。 this is practically the case everywhere, but as a rule it is not instrumental. The possession of a diploma has bee a necessary but by no means a sufficient condition for finding a job or being hired. When it es to rating the qualities of a potential worker, the employer bases himself on different criteria: in particular, experience acquired in a previous job, if any, and also individual/personal (inhouse) criteria of testing and selecting personnel, the procedure of a trial period. In spite of all their abstract plaints about the low professional quality of workers and about the difficulties of finding highly qualified cadres, when it es to the actual hiring it is of little importance to employers what the workers were taught, and how, in the institutions of the system of professional education. When they hire someone to work, enterprise managers rarely are interested in ―ageold‖ information such as the location, prestige, and fundamental soundness of the educational institution where he got a diploma, the courses he took and the disciplines he learned, or, in fact, the grades he earned. It is not surprising, for this reason, that the relatively new criteria of the quality of the institutions providing professional education, such as their rating, are of so little interest to employers. And despite the widely publicized cases reporting the use of forged diplomas certifying a professional education, only half of the employers feel it is necessary to check whether the credentials that workers submit attesting to a professional education are genuine. The requirement that a person have a diploma certifying a professional education to be hired is purely formal. Having a certificate that attests to a professional education does not serve as a tool for evaluating the quality of a worker’s。