原版

erformance against the project plan and managing corrective action to closure when actual performance or results deviate significantly from the plan.” SAM (see general evidence)  “This policy

port), but they must show evidence of manager review of pertinent information and corrective action where appropriate. Process Management OPF (see general evidence) “These reviews are typically in

training topics include the following:  Estimating  Budgeting  Negotiating  Risk identification and analysis  Data management  Planning  Scheduling” PMC (see general evidence)  Mentoring or

ynamic models。 process modeling tools。 statistical analysis packages。 problem tracking packages.]  Tools: estimation tools  Staff: statisticians。 measurement analysts  “Special expertise in

and resources for performing project planning  Recognize this is a plan for the project planning activities, ., how will the planning get done? This is often done during proposal or project startup.

ing issues on the pleteness and correctness of the project risks Reviewing data management plans Establishing project plans Reviewing project plans and resolving issues on work and resource issues”

les of work products reviewed include the following:  Plan for Supplier Agreement Management  Supplier agreements IPM (*IPPD) (see general evidence) Examples of activities reviewed include the

nce on the practices used to establish the standard process  See IPM on how to establish and maintain the project’s defined process  A family of process descriptions may exist for use in different

f the OID PA  Lessons learned from performing the OID activities  Process(es) and procedures for performing the OID activities  Results of analysis of process improvement proposals  Deployment

ed affirmations Feb ‘03 TS Tim Kasse Francois Contreiras Removed affirmations Feb ‘03 PI Geoff Draper Francois Contreiras Ver Geoff Draper Aaron Clouse Val Geoff Draper Aaron Clouse OPF Jennifer